How to Organize Online Discussion

Audio: How to Organize Online Discussion, by Dr. Bin Song.
Video (picture-in-picture): How to Organize Online Discussion, by Dr. Bin Song.

Hallo, This is Bin Song from Philosophy and Religion at Washington College!

Thanks for Meghan and CTL to invite me to talk about my experience to organize online discussions.

I have one formal way, and another informal way to do it.

In the fall of 2019, I taught the course ‘comparative religion: eastern’, and designed two assignments which are very conducive to online discussion. And these two assignments are actually combined.

The titles of the assignments are called, for one, “reflection essayist and discussion leader,” for another, “quote and discussion.”

The general idea for “reflection essayist and discussion leader” is that each student needs to write one reflection essay about one assigned reading, post it in the discussion board of canvas. So, in the screenshot of the discussion board as an example, you can see it is Allison who posts her essay, and every other student needs to comment upon it in the format of “quote and discussion.” In other words, they need to quote words from the submitted essay, present their interpretation, and ask questions. What the essayist needs to do is to gather all views and opinions from these discussions, bring them into the classroom, and then lead the discussion for about 40 minutes. My role is to facilitate each step of this combined assignment. Sometimes students choose to answer their peers’ questions online in advance, like what Allison did, but this is not required. If there are some concepts which I think students need to know before the discussion, I will respond to their discussions in detail in the online form.

As indicated by the screenshot, the discussion is very robust.

For grading, for the student who writes the essay and leads the discussion, each of these two parts takes half of their final score on this particular assignment. The essay will be graded as a paper, and the leading of the discussion will be graded as a presentation. For all the “quote and discussions”, they will be just checked or unchecked, no particular score attached.

For the informal part of online discussion, which happens a lot in the past spring, I can give some tips about how to organize it using an example in the course of “Modern Philosophy.” I describe it as informal because no particular assignment is required for online discussion. But my general teaching in the spring is to combine synchronous and asynchronous teachings. So each week, I will assign a reading with a list of guiding questions, and then, I will post short videos to explain what I think need to clarify about the assigned reading. In the following, I will encourage students to discuss these short videos in the discussion board of canvas. Finally, on Thursday, we will divide students into manageable sizes of groups, and then, hold a virtual meeting with them, to continue to answer their questions or discuss issues raised in the discussion board.

As indicated by the screen shot, students in the class are indeed very dedicated to online discussion. I think if you ask tips, I can enumerate the following points, but they are definitely not exhaustive. And I believe some of my colleagues may have better ways to do this, but I will tell my own here:

(1) Online discussion is an extension of discussion in the classroom. In spring, whether students want to speak online rests upon their physical discussion experience in the classroom. So there are some normal standards for eliciting discussion such as: asking good questions, listening to each individual, tailoring your answers to each question and each student, being open to diverse views among students, be ready to change your own view when conversing with students, etc. You know, all these principles apply in an online environment, and among all of these, I feel the most important is to have students really feel safe, included, and will be surely benefited when they speak up. So, I would say this is a culture of liberal arts to nurture in one’s teaching, and if nurtured well, it will extend naturally to an online environment.


(2) As for online discussion per se, I think I answer the questions of students in an extra detailed way. This is because the answer to each question is visible to all students. And if you answer one question sufficiently well, other students will learn quite a lot from it. As indicated by the screenshot, sometimes this requires several rounds of discussion, because when I answer questions, I always try to, firstly, clarify what the students mean, and secondly, confirm whether my answer has addressed their issues. And I also like to connect students to each other when I address their questions. For instance, I will say, Peter’s question is relevant to the one asked by Holly. Quite often, these students can form a learning group because of this connection.

Ok, that’s all, I hope this is helpful, and would like to learn from you if you have your own way to do online discussions. Thanks!

Unit 5: Apply the Philosophy

Audio: Apply the Philosophy, by Dr. Bin Song
Video: Apply the Philosophy, by Dr. Bin Song.

Quiz:

(1) You need to write down your conclusion derived from the first five steps of LBT to practice “affirmation” or “autosuggestion.” Is this statement true or false?

(2) (A) If I am angry towards what I thought my roommate did, (B) I would shout at her immediately regardless of whether the thought is true or false. In this behavioral rule, which component is the justification?

(3) For the previous question, which component is the behavioral prescription?

(4) Which part of emotional reasoning normally functions as a “justification” for behavioral reasoning?
A, the rating of an intentional object
B, the report of an intentional object.
C, the emotion itself.

(5) What faculty is the most needed one for a counselee to implement a plan of action, and thus transform the old pattern of his behaviors?
A, willpower
B, intelligence
C, emotion

(6) What guidance can a philosophical counselor provide to enhance the willpower of a counselee to implement the prescribed plan of action?
A, affirmation or auto-suggestion
B, meditation
C, role-play in a conversation
D, other methods of psychotherapies if the counselor is qualified to offer.

(7) A philosophical counselor can guarantee that their service of philosophical counseling will lead to successful results. Is this statement true or false?

Unit 4: Six Steps of Philosophical Counseling

Audio: Six Steps of Philosophical Counseling, by Dr. Bin Song.
Video: Six Steps of Philosophical Counseling, by Dr. Bin Song

Required Reading:

Elliot Cohen, Logic-based Therapy and Everyday Emotions, xiii-xxxiii.

Quiz:

1, Premises are identified by a philosophical therapist as “fallacies” because they are

A, not realistic
B, not reasonable
C, tending to generate undesirable consequences to the flourishing of individual human life.

2, which of the following fallacies are attended to by a philosophical therapist?

A, Demanding perfection
B, Damning (of self, others, life, or the universe)
C, Bandwagon Thinking
D, Oversimplifying realities
E, Distorting probabilities.

3, To tackle the fallacies in one’s emotional reasoning, it is normally more effective to start to refute the premise in the highest order. Is this statement true or false?

4, Refuting a fallacy in the practice of philosophical counseling is similar to do so in an academic conference. The counselor needs to forcefully present their own view so as to correct the counselee’s wrong ideas. Is this statement true or false?

5, what is the reason for LBT to choose the Aristotelian virtue ethics as a major ethical framework?

A, because it helps to make good decisions.
B, because it helps to lay out universal ethical principles.
C, because it focuses upon the transformation of people’s inner disposition, habit and character traits.

6, which is the guiding virtue to correct the fallacy of “bandwagon thinking” in one’s emotional reasoning?

A, metaphysical security
B, self-respect
C, Authenticity.

7, A philosophical counselor can choose whatever philosophy they feel right to suggest to counselees in Step Five of LBT. Is this statement true of false?

8, Can you describe one philosophy which has changed, shaped or influenced your emotions or behaviors in your life?

Unit 3: Know What You Think When You Emote

Audio: Know what you think when you emote, by Dr. Bin Song.
Video: Know what you think when you emote, by Dr. Bin Song.

Required Reading:

Elliot D. Cohen, Logic-Based Therapy and Everyday Emotions, 3-21.

Quiz:

(1) All human emotions are rooted in thought and reasoning. Is this statement true or false?


(2) (A) My roommate, Peter, ate my cake which I put in the refrigerator when I was absent. (B) He is so selfish and just a piece of pig. (C) I am so angry and hate him. In this process of emotional reasoning of anger and hatred, which component is the intentional object (O)?


(3) Following the above question, which component is the rating (R)?

(4) Which of the following statements seem to be the highest rule, or the deepest belief that commands a chain of emotional reasoning?

A, all marketing is to sell products to people who do not need them, and therefore, I hate it.
B, I prefer to be approved by all people who matter to me, and therefore, I must be approved by all of them.
C, To have been divorced is such an awful event to my life, and nothing worse can be found in the entire universe.
D, No matter who is my girlfriend, my mother must approve of her, and have a very good relationship with her.


(5) All emotions listed by Dr. Cohen on page 8 of the assigned reading are wrong. We should avoid them as much as we can. Is this statement true or false?


(6) According to Dr. Cohen on page 9-10 of the assigned reading, all cases of depression can be treated by philosophical counseling. Is this statement true or false?


(7) Please recall one most recent case in your life when you had a strong emotional reaction to an event. Can you analyze its reasoning process using the method taught in this unit? While doing so, please try to write the reasoning down in a form of syllogism, and try to get to the highest rule. Please answer this question use a couple of sentences.

Unit 2: The Basics of Logic for Philosophical Counseling

Audio: the basics of logic for philosophical counseling, by Dr. Bin Song.
Video: the basics of logic for philosophical counseling, by Dr. Bin Song.

Quiz:

(1) When you arrive at your office, and find that the door has been opened; based upon your past experience, you conclude that the janitor is working inside right now. What type of reasoning are you utilizing to reach this conclusion?

A, Induction
B, Deduction

(2) A gym trainer is struggling to figure out whether he should quit the job he loves because he has the least clients among peer trainers. He thought that “All marketing strategies are to sell products that clients do not want, and I hate it. There is a specific way of marketing for gym trainers to promote their training programs. Therefore, I would not learn this marketing skill in my profession even if this means the decrease of the number of my clients.” What type of reasoning is this gym trainer using to reach his conclusion?

A, Induction
B, Deduction.

(3) If you get it correct on last question, how would you describe that gym trainer’s reasoning?

A, it is a valid and sound deductive reasoning.
B, It is a valid deductive reasoning because if the premises are true, the conclusion is true.
C, It is not a sound deductive reasoning because some premise of it is not true.

(4) Peter believes that a good child will get immediate approval from their parents about everything he or she has chosen or accomplished in the school. However, he chose a subject of study that he personally liked the most, but his parents do not quite approve of. Therefore, Peter conclude that he is not a good child. He feels deeply guilt about being so, and continually upsets himself whenever he is studying in the school. What kind of reasoning did Peter use to reach his conclusion?

A, induction.
B, deduction.

(5) How do you evaluate Peter’s emotion of guilt? Is it rational or irrational? Is it based upon a sound reasoning? What advice do you want to give to Peter? Please answer these questions using a couple of sentences.

(6) Please recall an event in your life which triggers a negative emotion from you. Can you uncover the emotional reasoning underlying the process, and evaluate it using the basics of logic you learned from this unit of the course? Please answer this questions using a couple of sentences.